« Clean Power Alliance is Coming - is that a Good Thing? | Climate Assessment Report: Dire Threat Largely Ignored » |
As 2018 drew to a close, the Pasadena City Council adopted a new Integrated Resource Plan that shows the path forward for the City in the coming years. Not surprisingly, there are some big changes in store as PWP moves away from fossil fuels and toward a greener future. Here’s our take…
We love Pasadena, but it has a long way to go before it becomes as green as we would like it to be. For example, here is PWP’s latest power content label that shows the sources of its electricity, compared to California as a whole:
Yikes! 31% of our power overall comes from burning coal - compared to just 4% for the state overall!
Somewhat surprising is the relatively low amount of natural gas in the mix, given that the Glenarm power plant is now entirely fueled by natural gas.
On the other hand, the City is doing very well in utilizing biomass and waste materials as a fuel source, well ahead of such efforts in the state as a whole.
So it is clear that a great deal of work is yet to be done, and it is the intent of the newly adopted IRP to show the way.
One thing that jumps out of the new plan is that coal is to be eliminated entirely by June of 2027 when existing supply contracts expire, and no new coal contracts will be signed. Moreover, that plant is scheduled to switch to natural gas by 2025, so coal burning for PWP should end by then.
As of the writing of the IRP, there were 1,303 PWP customers who have installed solar power systems at their homes or commercial/non-profit sites. Collectively, those systems amount to 10.4 MW of installed capacity, with an estimated annual production of 16,600 MWh of energy. That makes the average installed system size just under 8 kW.
One baffling detail in the planning section of the report: relying on a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) analysis by the Lazard consulting firm, they assert that the LCOE of residential solar (after allowing for the federal tax credit) is from 14.5-24¢/kWh! Frankly, we aren’t sure how they arrived at that number, since our projects generally project an LCOE in the 9-11¢/kWh range.
So more solar is in PWP’s future, but they won’t be supporting it on homes, schools, or businesses anymore. Sad.
Here are a couple more takeaways from the 249-page report:
You can find the entire report here: Pasadena’s Integrated Resource Plan.
Form is loading...