Some people are simply shameless, and it appears that the powers-that-be at SCE are among them. We just got this charming missive from the division at SCE that is responsible for processing Interconnection Applications:
Subject: Extended NEM Application Processing Timelines
Hello Contractors and Installers,
We are currently experiencing a high volume of new NEM applications. As a result, processing timelines are taking longer than expected. Please note, Interconnection Requests (IRs) may exceed our average processing timelines. Although most applications will be reviewed within 10 business days, some may take up to 20 business days to review.
To help mitigate this volume, we strongly recommend that you submit your application and the required documents in complete form, including all signatures and attachments. Ensuring that your applications are submitted in complete form helps us to minimize the number of touchpoints and reduce the application queue.
We request your cooperation and understanding as we work diligently in decreasing the application volume. Please refer to PowerClerk for the latest status of your application. If you have any additional questions, please send an email to Customer.Generation@sce.com.
Sincerely,
Eduyng Castano
Senior Manager of Customer Generation Programs
Southern California Edison
To deem this outrageous is to be way too kind. Gee, I wonder why there is a high volume of applications? Could it be because the bottom is dropping out of solar economics in SCE territory after the April 14th deadline? Who could have predicted that - apart from pretty much everyone who is paying attention. And how is it that SCE can unilaterally change the requirement for them to process applications? Doesn’t the CPUC have something to say about this?
The existing standard of 10 business days - two weeks on the calendar - was already a joke, but now they are saying that “some” applications could take 20 business days - nearly a month! Oh and to add insult to injury, they also raised the application fee - you know, the money that is supposed to cover application processing - by 25%! Must be nice to be able to jack the price that you are charging, while simultaneously reducing the service provided. Aren’t monopolies swell?
This is getting real folks. In an earlier post - find it here - we stated that we couldn’t guarantee NEM 2.0 for applications submitted after March 31st. But given this revision - and zero clarity on which applications might hit that 20-day limit, we need to push things up. RUN ON SUN WILL NOT GUARANTEE NEM 2.0 FOR ANY APPLICATION SUBMITTED AFTER MARCH 15! (The Ides of March indeed!)
This is a terrible way to run a business, but we have no control over the arbitrary nonsense coming from SCE. Please plan accordingly!
Net Energy Metering 2.0, or NEM 2.0 for short, is now the law of the land, at least in SCE territory. So what does that really mean for potential solar clients? Here’s the scoop…
NEM 2.0 brings three changes to how new solar clients will be treated by SCE (customers of PWP, LADWP, or any other muni utility are unaffected). Let’s take a quick run through each one:
So what does this all mean? The answer is, it varies. For some clients, particularly those with west-facing roofs, they may actually do better under TOU rates than they would have staying on the old, tiered rate plan. But to answer that question requires a proper analysis, and this is where potential solar clients need to do their homework and look closely at their solar bids.
Here’s what to look for. Your potential installer should be requesting that you provide them with SCE’s “interval data” for your home. This hour-by-hour data for the entire year allows for a proper analysis of your usage, and makes it possible to compare that historical usage with the modeled output of your proposed PV system. If they aren’t asking for interval data, they are taking shortcuts with their savings analysis - likely in ways that inflate your potential savings on paper, only to result in disappointment down the road.
Run on Sun uses UtilityAPI to access SCE data securely, and we employ EnergyToolbase (pictured above) to do our analysis of your potential savings - two of the most highly respected and sophisticated tools in the solar industry. We have the tools and the expertise to give you the most accurate projection of your future savings from solar - so let’s get started!
As a solar installer working in SCE’s territory, we get messages from them on a regular basis, including those regarding the upcoming transition to NEM 2.0. But the email we received today (actually two copies of it!) was a bit, how shall we say, high-strung? Here’s our take.
NEM 2.0 will occur when the first of two events occurs: SCE interconnects enough residential and commercial solar projects to reach 5.0% of its total aggregate power demand, or July 1. We have written before that SCE will never get to the 5% beforehand, so the deadline is 23:59:59 on June 30.
So we were a tad perplexed to see this email today - here’s a sample:
417 MWs Remaining in NEM 1.0
As SCE gets closer to its Net Energy Metering (NEM) 1.0 Cap, we want to remind everyone of the importance of submitting complete and accurate interconnection request(s) (IRs). You should be receiving similar notifications within the online application system (i.e., PowerClerk).
Why is the 417 MWs remaining important?
For those applicants and customers with an existing IR moving through the interconnection process, we are sharing this information so that you may plan accordingly as SCE approaches its NEM 1.0 Cap. Once the cap is reached, the existing NEM tariff will close to new customers and the NEM 2.0 (NEM Successor) tariff will become available. With approximately 417 MWs remaining in the NEM 1.0 cap, this is a friendly reminder to please submit all documentation necessary for receiving service under NEM 1.0 and do so as soon as possible.
(Emphasis in the original.)
Wow - you would think that this might happen any day now, based on that language. Except that it won’t - not even close.
Here are the underlying numbers: SCE’s total cap is 2,240 MWs - a target it has been building toward since 2007! As of today, in SCE’s territory, 1,823 MWs has been installed. That means it has taken roughly 3,595 days to install that capacity, which works out to roughly half a Megawatt per day. With 417 MWs left under the cap, and just under 58 days before July 1, we would have to be installing at the rate of 7.2 MWs/day! Uh, no. Just Not Going To Happen!
(If you would like to see exactly how much time we have before we hit the actual deadline, check out the Doomsday Clock on our Residential Solar page.)
However, the reality of that deadline does have consequences. For potential commercial clients, sorry, but you are out of luck - there is just not enough time to get a new commercial project designed, permitted, constructed, and approved before July 1.
Potential residential clients are in a slightly better position, but only slightly as your window of opportunity is rapidly closing. For example, we are already booked solid for the entire month of May with just SCE projects (we have pushed everyone else back to try and help as many as possible in SCE territory meet the deadline), and we can only guarantee an approved interconnection for NEM 1.0 by mid-June. If you’ve been thinking about solar in SCE-land, please don’t wait, call or email us today!
We have written at some length about how Net Energy Metering (NEM) works, and about the changes to NEM that are coming, aka Net Energy Metering 2.0. While both PG&E and SDG&E have already switched to the 2.0 version, SCE customers are still able to go solar under the existing, more favorable, rules, but not for long! (NB: PWP & LADWP customers are unaffected by this change, the following is only relevant to SCE customers.)
Here is our update as we dive headlong into the brave new world of NEM 2.0.
Under the rules adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), SCE must continue to allow new customers to operate under the current NEM 1.0 rules, until either of the following events occur:
- SCE reaches its NEM 1.0 cap of 5% of net aggregate demand, or
- We reach the deadline date of July 1, 2017.
As of this writing, SCE is still a full percentage point below its cap, with 480 MW worth of solar to install before the cap is reached. Quite simply, that will not happen between now and the end of June, so the deadline to get in on the current rules is 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 2017.
But here is the rub—to qualify, not only must the project have been completed, but a final, signed-off inspection card must also be submitted to SCE prior to the deadline. This is going to make June a difficult month as installers struggle to get projects completed and approved in time. Since approvals are at the whim of individual inspectors, many of whom are idiosyncratic (to be kind) in their understanding of what the code requires, it is difficult to guarantee that a project will be approved on first inspection.
Prudent consumers will want to make sure that first inspection occurs on or before June 15th.
Although NEM 2.0 is not the crushing blow to solar that some feared it might become, it still has a number of aspects that make it less appealing to the solar system owner. Here are the major differences:
The coming of NEM 2.0 has some obvious consequences—there will be a crush this spring to get projects approved before the new rules take effect (so don’t wait!), and the overall savings from going solar will be reduced, although not dramatically so.
But there are some unintended consequences as well. For one, these new rules will be a boon for intelligent storage systems, both to help reduce NBCs and to shift that otherwise exported energy to peak TOU periods. Storage systems with the “smarts” to do all that will suddenly make economic sense. (More on that in the near future, but for now just three little words: Enphase AC Battery!)
Another unintended consequence is the significantly increased difficulty in properly modeling the savings to be derived from adding solar. While some installation companies use sophisticated software like EnergyToolbase (as Run on Sun does), or build out sufficiently detailed spreadsheet models (as Run on Sun also does), for many, that level of complexity is simply overwhelming. So what will they do? More than likely, just create a number that is little more than a WAG (and no, not a SWAG).
The result is that potential solar clients need to push on companies providing them with solar quotes to justify their savings numbers. If they used something like EnergyToolbase they should be happy to point that out (although there is still the risk that they used it incorrectly…). If they used their own proprietary model, they should be able to explain how it works. But be wary of numbers, especially outliers that claim greater savings without sufficient documentation.